The Paradox of Choice
I’ve been thinking about having.
Do we
like to have, simply to have, or do we like to have, to use? Why do we like to
have so much to begin with? Is it because we think we need? Or is it because we
simply want?
I
definitely experience difficulty (or, excuse me, a lack of self-discipline) in
determining wants versus needs, mostly because I need very little but I want
quite a bit.
For example, I like
to have DVDs aplenty, but do I actually watch them? Eh, not so much. Because there’s Netflix, and Seinfeld is on
Hulu, and so is The Mindy Project, and if I have free time to watch a show, why
not look on Amazon Instant Video, where I could rent a movie I don’t actually own, because I should watch shows I haven’t seen before re-watching “Miss
Congeniality” for the 47th time, right? But if someone might argue that physical discs are unnecessary because you can find anything on the internet these days, I would look horrified and rebut that no, I need to have them in my grubby little hands! What if those movies were taken off the internet
or made inaccessible in some way? Having physical copies means that I can access
them any time I would like.
I’ve
only recently joined the cult of Spotify, mostly because up until this
point, I was scared off by how much I didn’t understand it. But now that I’m
slowly wading my way in and figuring out what it’s all about, my eyes have been
opened to this vast, freaking EXPANSIVE musical library available from my
computer at work, my phone, my ipad, my laptop….wherever I want it. So, you
could posit, it seems unnecessary to continue purchasing music. Why have iTunes at all, when
you can access all the music you would like and MORE on Spotify? Well…because…I
only have access to that music if I have an internet connection. When I’ve purchased songs, I have them, no
matter how much data is left, regardless of whether or not I’m in an airplane in
the sky or if I’m underground. I like
the security of knowing that I have my music, no matter what.
And
then, of course, there’s Pinterest.
Don’t get me wrong – I’m in love with it and I think it’s a genius idea
and I use it on the daily for sewing tutorials and cake decorating inspiration
and recipes, but…does it seem like Pinterest has simply digitized our
fascination and obsession with hoarding? I have bookmarked THOUSANDS of links
to pictures of succulents, ways to use puff pastry, and inspiration for when I
finally buy a home and can decorate my own kitchen. But people have successfully lived for
hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of years without looking up internet
tutorials on how to sew invisible zippers into a garment or referencing a database
of pumpkin carving ideas. So why is it so essential now? Maybe...just because it’s there? Sometimes I try
to go through and cull my pins, asking myself if I really need
to know how to make chocolate-dipped strawberries look like they’re wearing
tiny tuxedos. Usually, no, but I like
to have access to the resource…just in
case. Just in case there was a formal strawberry emergency?
So, what is
the moral of this story?
I simply
like to have things. Whether those things are tangible or digital,
I’m reassured knowing they’re there for me at a moment's notice.
I don’t
bring this up to discuss my obviously rampant materialism, but more to present
the pervasiveness of this attitude, which extends to so many other areas – obviously
books, clothes, restaurants, even how I meal plan.
But I’m
now realizing that this hoarding tendency and this obsession with having might stem less from insatiable
greed than from our society’s obsession with HAVING OPTIONS.
We like
the freedom to choose, whether imagined or actual. We enjoy the independence of asserting our
individual preferences, followed by the resourcefulness and promptness of the
world in being able to provide us with the exact kind of entertainment or food we crave at a moment’s notice.
So, hey,
what’s the big deal? Why does this matter? So what if people want to have 12
chain restaurants in a shopping area from which to choose their lunch? Calm down, it's not hurting anyone. I know, I know.
But I
think the reasons this attitude bothers me is twofold:
- Because I’m paralyzing indecisive.
- Because I’ve started transferring this idea to how I treat people, namely in my attitude towards dating. With the prevalence of social media and various dating apps and websites these days, I find myself plagued with around-the-corner/the-grass-is-greener syndrome, wherein I am unable to fully appreciate one specific person because I’m still anxiously scanning the horizon, like a meerkat, looking for guys who might be taller or funnier or make more money or be more suited to catering to my every whim, mentally swiping left and right on every potential suitor. At first, I mistakenly conned myself into believing that I was the victim and that ALL GUYS were the culprits, that guys in general had their sights set too lofty on the perfect non-existent girl, and that they weren’t dating me because I didn’t match all of the checkmark boxes on their list for a future spouse. I projected that idea onto them, without realizing that I was doing that exact same thing to the guys I was dating or at least looking to date. My obsession with having options and with obtaining even more options had blinded me to my own self-righteous and unfair attitude of entitlement.
If anything, I’ve realized that having a multitude of options
doesn’t make a choice easier. While we think it would be quite ideal to have more options from
which to choose, an increase of selections only serves to complicate the
decision-making process. When
faced with a plethora of attractive options, I find myself narrowing in on the
possible missed opportunities from my hypothetical trade-offs, rather than
evaluating the potential of my singular choice. My uncertainty lies in my
inability to entertain every alternative in order to determine whether I’ve
made the right decision or not, but once I’ve made my choice, I want to feel
good about what I’ve decided, adjusting my perceptions, memory and even
viewpoint to accommodate this route where necessary. If my choice resulted in favorable outcomes,
I glory in myself for having made such a perspicacious judgment; if it turns
out poorly, I then try to blame the circumstance or literally anybody else. (Think: multiple-choice tests.)
“Autonomy and freedom of choice are critical to our well-being, and choice is critical to freedom and
autonomy. Nonetheless, though modern Americans have
more choice than any group of people ever has before, and thus, presumably,
more freedom and autonomy, we don't seem to be benefiting from it psychologically.” — quoted
from Barry Schwartz, The
Paradox of Choice, Ch. 5, 2004
I think
what I’m ultimately getting at here is a realization and acknowledgement that I
need (or is it a want?) to learn to be content with what I have and to stop
thinking I need/deserve/am entitled to more.
I hope to stop taking so much for granted and to appreciate what I do
have. (And give, and share, and
receive.)
And, for
the time being, to take a much-needed respite from online dating.
Great post. My favorite line: "like a meerkat."
ReplyDeleteIts so true! Everything is an endless catalogue and it still isn't enough. And if you finally get everything, it's out of style next year and you need all new stuff!
ReplyDeleteGreat insights. I realize for myself how much time all the extra choices take. Well written thoughts!
ReplyDelete